Jeff Randall | sitemap | log in
|
||
![]() |
||
No Redemptionby Jeff Randall - 00:23 on 04 July 2008Not the best of weeks so far but Friday, quite literally, is just around the corner bringing with it a wave of optimistic improvement. It is not in my nature to compromise anyone specifically but as I speak to this blank page at this time it is difficult not to succumb to irritation. I find it puzzling that people who say that they have moved on are still employing the same wind-up tactics they did 2-10 years ago. Full of contradictory statements, implausible assertations and habitual untruths constructed purely for effect. Thankfully, some us us have truly “moved on” and are happy with their lives and no longer require the stimulus of argumentative angst. That is not to say that one is no longer human. It is harder to walk away but much more satisfying in the long run – of that there is no doubt. Three years ago I was fed to the wolves by a very close-knit (some would say too close) body of people in order to defend a depraved individual who had been afforded access to two people who were once close to me. Because of that individual I am no longer in direct contact with these people. Even now, that situation continues to impact upon me, and once again it boils down to the lack of an ability in some people to accept responsibility for their own actions- a trait which I am discovering by the day is displayed mainly by power-obsessed control freaks. I was put in an impossible position eventually walking down the only avenue available to me and I ended up in a courtroom accused of a crime against a criminal whose transgressions are, to all normal thinking people, unforgivable and at the high end of the evil scale. Some people, however, choose to believe that an offender (never to be referred to as a man or even a human being such is the nature of his abberative predilections) of this disposition should be afforded sympathy and rights but I will never do so. As far as I am concerned anyone who is an apologist for an offender who commits crimes such as he did is equally culpable, particularly when they have custodial charge of others who are akin to the offenders victims (as discerned and punished by a court of law and documented as such). Obviously I cannot be explicit in this matter but I am becoming increasingly pissed-off being portrayed as the bad guy in this one and while I have admitted behaving badly and indeed breaking the law on occasion there are different levels. This one is in a different universe yet still I must remain tacit in order not to give offence. Well, enough is enough! Its a poor indictment on our society when one convicted of heinous criminal offences is permitted a hot-line to the cops for his protection when you and me are fobbed off with an automated message in a call centre. When we are eventually connected to a real-life person (not a real-life police officer mind you) our complaint is "prioritised" and more often than not the response time is longer than a weekend in the cells, unlike the situation regarding the protected species of peculiar animals who are responded to swifter than it would take Clark Kent to morph into Superman in a call-box; faster than a speeding bullet if you will! It is equally sad when the crimes of these monsters are secreted from the rest of us when really they should do their time (all of it, not just seven or so measly months on Rule 43 where they can network with like-minded agents of iniquity) then take their chances in the outside world. These offenders have no place in our society yet still they are permitted to spread their malevolence with impunity, corrupting those in their circle which in turn impacts upon innocent bystanders who are rendered impotent by a system which needs to get it's priorities right pretty damn quickly. Sanctions are way too lax in these cases and repercussions are arrested before proper justice can be exacted. Because of editorial constraints and what was a misguided sense of fair play I eventually became comfortable(ish) with having this very important episode in my life removed from the final edit of the book – it is alluded to on page 213. However, I will never agree to airbrushing it from my life; it was horrible, terrifying and completely unfair but I accepted (without liking) the fact that I was forced into a very difficult position as I strove purely to protect two heavilly controlled innocents from a disgusting, poisonous influence but the time will come one day when I will paint the picture in all its technicolor horror – not out of a sense of vengeance but purely to heighten awareness of a corrupted, systematic abuse which has been woven serruptitiosly into our legal and social fabric. I am now grateful that I am not part of the environment I once was but I still have concerns for those that are helpless to fight back against what is fundamentally discordantly anachronistic being sewn into their lives by people who have embraced, by association if nothing else, and are gleefully inclusive of, the absolute scum of the earth which they welcome into their bosom. But nothing is eternal in this life and some people would do well to remember that! (c) J Randall 4th July 2008
Add your comment |
|
|
![]() |
||